Categories
Blog Posts

Do Not Vote Blue (Or Red) No Matter Who

Let me start out by saying that I have no intention of becoming a political commentator.

I find politics exhausting and, these days, very divisive, so talking about politics here will be an anomaly. Even so, I won’t be talking in favor or one party or another.

Indeed, the only reason I’m writing about this topic at all is because I find what I have to say bipartisan, or even nonpartisan, and I think my point can and should be applied to a great many topics.

That point being this: Voting along party lines no matter what is simply not using your brain.

In a broader context, doing or going along with anything without thinking about it is, quite literally, not using your brain.

So do not vote blue no matter who. Or red for that matter. Or yellow or green.

I recently saw a post on social media, something I’ve been consuming less and less of lately, explaining why it’s so crucial that people vote blue no matter who this November.

It listed off things like potential supreme court justices, administration officials, cabinet picks, etc. And then it listed off other, more polemical things like border control, abortion rights, and law enforcement.

Ending with stating something along the lines of, “Even if you don’t like Joe Biden, this election is too important to vote otherwise. Vote blue no matter who.”

That post was in favor of the blue team. But the red team could take that exact same post, change the word blue to red and it would be in favor of the red team. And there lies my problem with hyper-partisanship.

Saying that this election is too important sounds like a good argument, but I believe it falls apart when confronted and examined.

“I would vote third party but *insert election year here* is too important.”

If you believe that your party is always the right choice, then it won’t matter what election year it is because you won’t have to decide for yourself.

And if some partisan shill convinces you that a certain election is too important to vote third party then why would they not do the same for the next one?

There’s also the argument that we have to choose the lesser evil. And the lesser evil changes based on who you ask.

Doing this will lead us into a downward spiral that will eventually look like this:

“I don’t wanna vote for Satan but at least he’s not MegaSatan.”

Jokes aside, it’s best to vote for neither the Beast nor the Dragon.

There are other options out there. And the only reason they don’t get enough votes is because we’re… You know. Unwilling to vote for them.

And I’m not pushing for you to vote for the Libertarian party or the Green party, or even to write a candidate in. Instead my point is to simply stop and think about it before you make decisions.

You might be stuck in a bubble when you accept one team without question. We all know that the mainstream media is biased these days, even, or maybe especially, when they claim to be unbiased.

All you need to do to see this is look at the coverage of any current event by Fox News and then look at the coverage of it by CNN. If Fox News is in favor of it then it’s highly likely that CNN will be against it, and vice versa.

Instead, perhaps you should make up your own mind about the event instead of absorbing what the talking heads have to say about it.

A blue team member might express his disappointment with red team voters. Claiming that they just repeat word for word what their leaders say.

Well yes, I’m sure some of them do. But there are also members of the blue team that regurgitate the same exact things that their own leaders say.

So who’s right and who’s wrong and who’s hypocritical?

That’s up to you.

I know such a thing is not easy and I by no means am perfect about it either. But it may help to take a step back from everything before you decide.

The amount of polarization we’ve seen in the last few years won’t get us anywhere.

Calling the people on the other team, “Deplorables,” or Nazis, or communists, or thugs, or any other vitriolic term, isn’t exactly going to change their mind.

That said, IF someone actually is a Nazi or a communist or a thug, then we can safely be united against them. But throwing those words around like candy doesn’t make it true.

What it does do however, is make those words less effective when you actually meet someone like that (see: the boy who cried wolf) and it makes the accused resent you.

Instead we should reserve judgement until we’ve looked at things with a calm, dispassionate mindset.

What are this person’s policies? Do they line up with my beliefs? If someone is being accused of something, are they actually guilty of that? Or is the accuser just a deranged, radical person?

I read something that makes a very good point the other day; the general message was that in these next few months, we will be barraged with messages that try to tear us apart and convince us that the other team is bad. And that we can’t let ourselves fall for it.

That point is the reason why I’ve been referring to the Democrat and Republican parties as the blue team and red team.

“Yeah go blue/red team! The red/blue team sucks!”

“Why do they suck?”

“Well uh, because they’re the red/blue team and I’m on the blue/red team so screw them!”

Unfortunately, we don’t have the luxury of treating the future of our country the way we treat sports teams.

Do not allow politicians, media, intellectuals, or anyone else, convince you of otherwise.

Once you have taken a sober look at what each group stands for and you’ve found one you agree with, vote for that group.

Vote blue or red or yellow or green or whatever you genuinely think is the best choice according to your conscience.

And the only way we’ll escape this two party system that we all seem to hate so much is if we actually vote according to our consciences and not just for the party or candidate that we think is, “not as bad,” as the other one.

George Washington and John Adams both warned us against becoming too partisan and Abraham Lincoln told us that a house divided amongst itself cannot stand. Although well over a century too late, maybe it’s time we take their words to heart.

Regardless of who wins, we are ALL Americans and therefore in the same boat. And a ship will never leave the harbor if its crew is too busy fighting each other.

Thank you for reading.

Categories
Blog Posts

Joker: A 2019 Film About 2020

I was going to write a lighthearted post a few weeks ago comparing Disney’s Tangled to the social isolation we recently went through… but then another thing happened and shifted our attention away from the virus.

Maybe later when things have cooled down.

Today, I’ll be talking about the eerie similarities of Joker (2019), and our current situation in America and the world.

When Joker came out, the country was generally calm and prosperous. At least compared to this year.

It was also free of a certain virus of contested origin (External link).

I saw it in theaters and was gripped by it the entire time. Re-watching it recently, it’s bizarre how much it reflects our current situation. Like it was a warning that we didn’t heed.

Of course, it’s not necessarily a direct comparison to any one thing and, being a movie, we’re limited in what we’re able to see and what we do see is shown from the protagonist’s point of view.

Regardless, the similarities are plentiful. There will be spoilers but I’ll keep the big ones to a minimum. If you’re interested in watching the movie and haven’t had it spoiled yet, I recommend you go watch the movie and then come back and read. I watched it on Amazon. It plays through an HBO subscription (they offer a 7 day free trial) but you can watch whatever way is convenient for you. Obviously.

Let’s dig in.

Joker follows Arthur Fleck and his descent into madness, eventually becoming the titular Batman villain.

While it’s technically a comic book film, you wouldn’t know it if there was no prior knowledge that it was about Batman’s nemesis. It’s dark, angry, resentful, and more. Perhaps most importantly, there is no Caped Crusader. In fact, Bruce Wayne is still a child in this rendition.

Arthur’s working as a clown where he gets jobs holding store signs and entertaining at children’s hospitals. At the opening of the film, he’s preparing for the work day. In the background, people are talking on the radio about the garbage and rat problem in the city.

This was the first similarity I noticed. We are currently in an unprecedented health crisis.

In the film, there is unchecked waste and rats. Both of which bring disease. As a matter of fact, fleas living on rats transferred the Black Plague to humans.

Arthur puts on a happy face. Credit: Warner Bros.

After the scene mentioned above, he’s beaten with his store sign and kicked by a group of street thugs for seemingly no other reason than they wanted to. The sign is taken out of his pay for failing to return it to the store owner after it was smashed over his head.

At another point, Arthur is forced to defend himself from three young, Wall Street looking guys in the subway. Although at least one of the kills was more of an execution than it was an act of self defense.

This prompts the police to begin an investigation of a triple homicide. It also sparks an anti-establishment movement that grows more and more violent as the movie progresses.

At the same time, this causes Thomas Wayne, the rich father of Bruce Wayne (Batman) to launch his bid for mayor of Gotham. Claiming he can fix the city’s problems and denouncing the increasingly violent ‘clown’ movement.

After Arthur is made fun of on his favorite late night talk show, The Murray Franklin Show, he’s invited on the show. Evidently, the bit received a lot of attention.

This makes up the climax of the movie, Joker dances down the steps he previously struggled to climb, then runs from the detectives investigating the previously mentioned triple homicide.

On the train, he looses the detectives in a mob of clown-masked protesters. They turn on the cops and interfere with their work, eventually tackling and beating them after one of the detectives shoots a protester that was grappling with him.

Arthur/Joker laughs at the detectives being beaten. C: Warner Bros.

I didn’t notice until I took this screenshot, but in the above image, behind Arthur, you can see a protester holding an anti-capitalism sign. Albeit a blurry one, camera being focused on Arthur.

After Arthur’s appearance on The Murray Franklin Show, he’s taken into custody and is being driven in a police cruiser through the streets of Gotham. The city has devolved into chaos, police have lost control of the situation, vehicles are being burned and windows are being smashed.

Then, an ambulance that had been hijacked rams into the police cruiser. The clown protesters exit the ambulance and free Joker from the car. A crowd forms to cheer on the Joker. The murderer and inspiration for the movement that has turned towards violence and destruction.

Joker revels in applause after being freed from police custody. C: Warner Bros.

After that brief summary using intentionally chosen moments, you’ve probably already guessed the comparisons I’m trying to make.

I’d still like to address them directly for clarity’s sake.

Joker drew quite a bit of controversy when it came out. The main argument was that it could inspire disenfranchised people to commit acts of violence. Even prompting the U.S. Army to issue a note to its members (External link). Thankfully, there were no theater shootings.

This film is about a man and a society that has lost hope. Left with nothing but to destroy and hurt.

Arthur is first beaten by street thugs and later beaten by thugs in suits.

In the limited view we’re offered by the film, it’s difficult to know for certain if the clown movement started off peacefully or if it was always violent. Nonetheless, there is no doubt by the end of the movie that it has turned towards destruction.

Of course, in the real world, there were many protests that remained peaceful and for a good cause. As far as I’m concerned, there is no genuine argument for saying what sparked the current movement was wrong and very few people would challenge that.

But, like the ambulance hijackers in Joker, what may have been a peaceful movement for a good cause was hijacked in multiple cases by bad people not interested in positive change or justice. Just destruction and chaos.

I understand what I’m saying may be considered controversial by some, but I feel it necessary to say. After all, why would it be controversial to condemn the destruction and burning of cities where those hurt the most are not the intended target?

The masked rioters at the end of Joker are not interested in changing things. They are interested in mayhem and lashing out. Sort of like those bad actors in real life that used the civil unrest as an opportunity to steal, destroy, hurt/kill, distract from those who are seeking positive change, and push a bad agenda.

The mob worships the Joker. C: Warner Bros.

Amid all this, Thomas Wayne sees an opportunity to advance his political goals. He speaks of the protesters with contempt while attending film screenings and operas.

The elites who presume to rule over us in the real world have shown their own true colors in a similar fashion. I’m sure you can think of corporations and people on either side of the political aisle who have used pandemic and protest to further their own interests and power.

The film shows stark contrasts between the haves and the have-nots. Thomas Wayne lives in a beautiful mansion on a big estate and visits beautiful opera houses where the bathrooms are probably as big as Arthur’s entire apartment. Murray Franklin performs on a TV set each night with a band and bright, multicolored curtains.

Meanwhile, the rest of the town is vandalized, dull, and blanketed in disrepair and squalor.

The Wayne Family beside a protester holding an upside down sign that reads, ‘RESIST.’ C: Warner Bros.

At the time, the real world was not like the Joker world. At least not actively. Today, it is too much like it.

I believe Joker received so much negative press because it lays blame at all of our feet. Not just those that we don’t like. And we all know how the press likes to guide our morality and claim they’re always right.

This film does not glorify the protagonist. It doesn’t try to justify his actions. It’s very clear that he’s a villain.

It shows us a world where almost everyone is a villain in some way.

It shows us how a man can devolve into nihilism when a society abandons him.

It shows us how a protest can get out of hand.

It shows us how the elites don’t care. Even if they say they do.

It shows us what terrible evil a person and society with no property, no God, no loved ones, nothing, is capable of.

It shows us that, no matter how much we don’t like to admit it, monsters are made, not born. We very well may have had a part in making it. It may even be us.

Joker is a harsh criticism of what our world has become. That doesn’t mean we can’t learn from it.

Even if you alone made the monster, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t stop it.

Stand on your feet. Work towards positive change. Do not allow bad people with bad intentions and bad ideologies dictate your words and actions.

“Human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” – John Adams

Build. Do not deface, topple, or burn.

“Don’t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong.” -Calvin Coolidge

Thank you for reading.